THE PERSON BEHIND GALAXYLINK
Looking towards space. Building with life on Earth in mind.
Eby Mathew is a Perth-based entrepreneur and director with more than 25 years of experience across technology, business and marketing. He is the founder of Accelerate Business Performance and is involved in social and disability housing through ASH Spectrum.
His community service includes his role as Vice President of the Joondalup Business Association, his previous presidency of the Lions Club of Whitford and his current work as a Lions Zone Chairperson.
He founded GalaxyLink to explore how space, sustainable energy, artificial intelligence, computing and robotics could contribute to better human living. He is also developing the Quantum Aurora concept, a proposed sovereign AI and sustainable-infrastructure initiative.
GalaxyLink brings his commercial perspective and long-term curiosity together. It is being developed as a research and information platform with early software experiments, a commitment to clear evidence and an ambition to identify useful independent technologies.
Eby’s role is to set the purpose, connect people and ideas, develop the commercial direction and help turn inquiry into accountable work.
Dear fellow explorer,
There is a question behind GalaxyLink that matters deeply to me:
If we become more capable, how do we make life better?
It is a simple question with consequences that reach far beyond any one company or technology.
We can imagine more intelligent machines, new ways to generate and use energy, and systems operating beyond Earth. Each possibility opens another. Each also asks us to consider the purpose of what we are building.
My interest in space exploration sits alongside a responsibility I feel towards our own planet. I want to understand how a more ambitious future can support cleaner energy, careful use of resources and better conditions for people to live and work.
That combination of curiosity and responsibility is the starting point for GalaxyLink.
I approach this work as an entrepreneur and director whose experience spans business and technology.
That perspective makes me interested in the space between an appealing idea and something people can actually use. Who has the problem? What would change for them? What must be proved? What does it cost to deliver, maintain and improve?
Those questions do not diminish ambition. They give it a path.
Progress requires people who understand the science, engineering, operating environment and human consequences. GalaxyLink should help those perspectives meet around useful questions.
My responsibility as founder is to create the conditions for that work: a clear purpose, honest communication, thoughtful priorities and a willingness to change direction when the evidence calls for it.
A meaningful venture needs a way to retain knowledge, connect it and test what it appears to tell us.
That is why GalaxyLink begins with a living library.
I want a reader to be able to move from an unfamiliar concept to an understandable explanation, then into the original evidence and the questions still open. I want an engineer to see where a claim came from. I want a potential partner to understand the reasoning behind our priorities.
Our early stage matters. We are developing the platform and exploring small software experiments. The larger vision remains a direction to work towards. Every future claim about performance, deployment or commercial value must earn its supporting evidence.
I want GalaxyLink to encourage ambitious thinking while rewarding careful work.
I want us to be curious enough to consider unfamiliar ideas and disciplined enough to examine them properly.
I want us to treat a failed experiment as information, acknowledge other people’s contributions and remain clear about the difference between what we hope for and what we have demonstrated.
Above all, I want the human purpose to remain visible. Better technology should create benefits people can recognise: safer work, more useful services, better use of resources and more opportunity to participate in the future.
You may bring technical depth, an operating problem, commercial experience or a question we have not thought to ask.
I would welcome a conversation that helps us make the work more useful.
For researchers and engineers, that might mean challenging an assumption. For operators, it might mean showing us a constraint that current tools handle poorly. For partners and investors, it might mean helping define a focused experiment with a credible route to value.
I cannot promise where every inquiry will lead. I can make the standards of the inquiry clear.
We will look closely. We will distinguish evidence from expectation. We will choose work that has a reason to matter.
Thank you for taking the time to explore GalaxyLink. I hope you find an idea that opens a new possibility—and a question worth pursuing together.
Eby Mathew
Founder, GalaxyLink
Perth, Western Australia
Terafab links logic, memory and packaging in one proposed manufacturing system. We examine the potential feedback advantages, the evidence that would establish progress, and the smaller research opportunities an independent team can investigate.
A computer in orbit still needs a complete operating system of energy, heat rejection, communications and recovery. The credible comparison is useful work delivered over a mission, with uncertainty visible.
NASA’s 2024 study modelled specific future solar-power architectures. Its findings help frame the questions that matter: delivered electricity, complete lifecycle costs, environmental effects and alternatives that provide the same service.
A Dyson swarm imagines many collectors around a star. Kardashev Type II describes stellar-scale energy use. Both help organise big questions, but neither proves a practical route, a development timetable or a desirable social outcome.
The Matrioshka brain imagines layers of computing around a star. Its enduring lesson is that information processing has physical limits; nesting alone does not establish superior efficiency, intelligence or feasibility.
A robot performing a task once is a beginning. A dependable manufacturing system must cope with variation, inspect its work and recover from interruptions. That creates a practical research direction for an independent team.